<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for EGOPOLY</title>
	<atom:link href="http://egopoly.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://egopoly.com</link>
	<description>Because I can't remember anything unless I write it down.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Note to self: RRDtool by billo</title>
		<link>http://egopoly.com/2006/07/17/note-to-self-rrdtool/#comment-7841</link>
		<dc:creator>billo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egopoly.com/wordpress/2006/07/17/note-to-self-rrdtool/#comment-7841</guid>
		<description>We now use RRDtool for nearly all of our time-series performance plotting.  It's so much easier to use and better than gnuplot at this particular problem. It's also much faster at cunching through the data, which makes a difference when you need to generate thousands of graphs every night (we do).

RRDtool is extremely popular, and we don't have any problems with it crashing... once it is installed.  I must say, it can be quite difficult to get compiled and running properly on different operating systems.  It seems like every time I try it on a new Linux distribution there is a whole new host of issues to deal with, more so than most mature open source projects. 

We're willing to put up with these problems because we haven't found anything better at this particular problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We now use RRDtool for nearly all of our time-series performance plotting.  It&#8217;s so much easier to use and better than gnuplot at this particular problem. It&#8217;s also much faster at cunching through the data, which makes a difference when you need to generate thousands of graphs every night (we do).</p>
<p>RRDtool is extremely popular, and we don&#8217;t have any problems with it crashing&#8230; once it is installed.  I must say, it can be quite difficult to get compiled and running properly on different operating systems.  It seems like every time I try it on a new Linux distribution there is a whole new host of issues to deal with, more so than most mature open source projects. </p>
<p>We&#8217;re willing to put up with these problems because we haven&#8217;t found anything better at this particular problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Note to self: RRDtool by Spambox</title>
		<link>http://egopoly.com/2006/07/17/note-to-self-rrdtool/#comment-7834</link>
		<dc:creator>Spambox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egopoly.com/wordpress/2006/07/17/note-to-self-rrdtool/#comment-7834</guid>
		<description>So how is the progress?

I found this note when googling with words "gnuplot" "rrdtool".
And all I want to say is: Rrdtool is more like a pioneer's (aka newbie's) project.
For example: rrdcgi tool (intended to process html-templates) randomly segfaults without any reasons leaving no notices.
Actually I was searching for a rrdgraph-scenario to gnuplot-scenario converter and still being unsuccesful.
rrdtool is best at collecting, preprocessing and storing data values, but it's graphing capabilities,
being so cool-looking, still are too poor, when compared to real graphing software.
Still, I do not understand why Tobias (rrdtool author) had to reinvent it's own grapher instead of making
good templates (or even better - template generator) for software like gnuplot or any other.
It smells like a pioneer's approach...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how is the progress?</p>
<p>I found this note when googling with words &#8220;gnuplot&#8221; &#8220;rrdtool&#8221;.<br />
And all I want to say is: Rrdtool is more like a pioneer&#8217;s (aka newbie&#8217;s) project.<br />
For example: rrdcgi tool (intended to process html-templates) randomly segfaults without any reasons leaving no notices.<br />
Actually I was searching for a rrdgraph-scenario to gnuplot-scenario converter and still being unsuccesful.<br />
rrdtool is best at collecting, preprocessing and storing data values, but it&#8217;s graphing capabilities,<br />
being so cool-looking, still are too poor, when compared to real graphing software.<br />
Still, I do not understand why Tobias (rrdtool author) had to reinvent it&#8217;s own grapher instead of making<br />
good templates (or even better - template generator) for software like gnuplot or any other.<br />
It smells like a pioneer&#8217;s approach&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to install tomcat mod_jk on Mac OS X Leopard by Miracle Occurs Here &#187; Blog Archive &#187; mod_jk Fail, mod_proxy Success</title>
		<link>http://egopoly.com/2007/10/29/how-to-install-tomcat-mod_jk-on-mac-os-x-leopard/#comment-7777</link>
		<dc:creator>Miracle Occurs Here &#187; Blog Archive &#187; mod_jk Fail, mod_proxy Success</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 05:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egopoly.com/2007/10/29/how-to-install-tomcat-mod_jk-on-mac-os-x-leopard/#comment-7777</guid>
		<description>[...] http://egopoly.com/2007/10/29/how-to-install-tomcat-mod_jk-on-mac-os-x-leopard/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://egopoly.com/2007/10/29/how-to-install-tomcat-mod_jk-on-mac-os-x-leopard/" rel="nofollow">http://egopoly.com/2007/10/29/how-to-install-tomcat-mod_jk-on-mac-os-x-leopard/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My checklist for Linux setup by billo</title>
		<link>http://egopoly.com/2008/11/03/my-checklist-for-linux-setup/#comment-7653</link>
		<dc:creator>billo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egopoly.com/?p=419#comment-7653</guid>
		<description>Good point.  It's not so much a plan as an active set of notes of stuff I am doing. 

Right now I'm stuck on rrdtool; the perl bindings won't work.  Ugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point.  It&#8217;s not so much a plan as an active set of notes of stuff I am doing. </p>
<p>Right now I&#8217;m stuck on rrdtool; the perl bindings won&#8217;t work.  Ugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My checklist for Linux setup by ben</title>
		<link>http://egopoly.com/2008/11/03/my-checklist-for-linux-setup/#comment-7648</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 03:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egopoly.com/?p=419#comment-7648</guid>
		<description>/etc/passwd and shadowbut not group or sudoers?  I think there might be a few bits that are missing from your plan. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>/etc/passwd and shadowbut not group or sudoers?  I think there might be a few bits that are missing from your plan. :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I Think a Blackberry is Probably Better for Doctor Wife by maplebed</title>
		<link>http://egopoly.com/2008/08/15/blackberry-probably-better-for-doctor-wife/#comment-7517</link>
		<dc:creator>maplebed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egopoly.com/?p=388#comment-7517</guid>
		<description>nice comparison.  I just switched from blackberry to iPhone, and you're totally right - the workflow is definitely more roundabout.  At the same time, it's got way more shiny things.  Good for you and me, the IT types, not good for spewing blood.  

Just today I wanted to show off my new SMS tone to a coworker.  While I was tapping away at buttons trying to get a sample of the sound, another coworker sitting next to us sent me an SMS and it rang before I could find the tone.  This is not an efficient interface.  

One thing I was really expecting to miss switching from the BB to the iPhone is the ability to dial without looking at the phone.  The physical feedback meant I could dial a phone number while driving (that would be picked up on my car's bluetooth) without taking my eyes off the road.  No can do with the iPhone (with the exception of putting one person on speed dial with the CallMe app - requires jailbreaking).  

I do miss the ability to forward select mail to the device and have it reliably show up there.  I could use the data connection for things like nagios pages without having all my work mail showing up on the blackberry.  Again, no can do with the iPhone - I'm stuck using SMS (which is actually turning out ok, now that I have a good alert tone).

Anyway.  Thanks for the blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice comparison.  I just switched from blackberry to iPhone, and you&#8217;re totally right - the workflow is definitely more roundabout.  At the same time, it&#8217;s got way more shiny things.  Good for you and me, the IT types, not good for spewing blood.  </p>
<p>Just today I wanted to show off my new SMS tone to a coworker.  While I was tapping away at buttons trying to get a sample of the sound, another coworker sitting next to us sent me an SMS and it rang before I could find the tone.  This is not an efficient interface.  </p>
<p>One thing I was really expecting to miss switching from the BB to the iPhone is the ability to dial without looking at the phone.  The physical feedback meant I could dial a phone number while driving (that would be picked up on my car&#8217;s bluetooth) without taking my eyes off the road.  No can do with the iPhone (with the exception of putting one person on speed dial with the CallMe app - requires jailbreaking).  </p>
<p>I do miss the ability to forward select mail to the device and have it reliably show up there.  I could use the data connection for things like nagios pages without having all my work mail showing up on the blackberry.  Again, no can do with the iPhone - I&#8217;m stuck using SMS (which is actually turning out ok, now that I have a good alert tone).</p>
<p>Anyway.  Thanks for the blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iPhone Ringtones, SMS Alerts and Physicians by maplebed</title>
		<link>http://egopoly.com/2008/08/12/iphone-ringtones-sms-alerts-and-physicians/#comment-7515</link>
		<dc:creator>maplebed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egopoly.com/?p=382#comment-7515</guid>
		<description>So you probably know this already, but at this point the 2.1 firmware has been successfully jailbroken, and it's pretty easy (and safe).  

@deadbum, that alarm kicks butt, but it was a bit too much for me.  I was threatened with getting kicked out of bed if it ever went off in the middle of the night...  

I made my own which actually is pretty loud, though it doesn't seem so during the day.  It's linked from my blog post about it: http://blog.hartshorne.net/2008/10/new-iphone-sms-alert.html

For those out there for whom the klaxon is a bit too much, you're welcome to steal http://ben.hartshorne.net/random/Japanese_Bell.aif (changing its name, of course, to sms-received#.caf - I chose 4 because I hate that horn).

-maplebed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you probably know this already, but at this point the 2.1 firmware has been successfully jailbroken, and it&#8217;s pretty easy (and safe).  </p>
<p>@deadbum, that alarm kicks butt, but it was a bit too much for me.  I was threatened with getting kicked out of bed if it ever went off in the middle of the night&#8230;  </p>
<p>I made my own which actually is pretty loud, though it doesn&#8217;t seem so during the day.  It&#8217;s linked from my blog post about it: <a href="http://blog.hartshorne.net/2008/10/new-iphone-sms-alert.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.hartshorne.net/2008/10/new-iphone-sms-alert.html</a></p>
<p>For those out there for whom the klaxon is a bit too much, you&#8217;re welcome to steal <a href="http://ben.hartshorne.net/random/Japanese_Bell.aif" rel="nofollow">http://ben.hartshorne.net/random/Japanese_Bell.aif</a> (changing its name, of course, to sms-received#.caf - I chose 4 because I hate that horn).</p>
<p>-maplebed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to install tomcat mod_jk on Mac OS X Leopard by billo</title>
		<link>http://egopoly.com/2007/10/29/how-to-install-tomcat-mod_jk-on-mac-os-x-leopard/#comment-7307</link>
		<dc:creator>billo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egopoly.com/2007/10/29/how-to-install-tomcat-mod_jk-on-mac-os-x-leopard/#comment-7307</guid>
		<description>I've completely switched over to using mod_proxy, mod_jk is just too painful for a simple desktop configuration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve completely switched over to using mod_proxy, mod_jk is just too painful for a simple desktop configuration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to install tomcat mod_jk on Mac OS X Leopard by leo</title>
		<link>http://egopoly.com/2007/10/29/how-to-install-tomcat-mod_jk-on-mac-os-x-leopard/#comment-7306</link>
		<dc:creator>leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egopoly.com/2007/10/29/how-to-install-tomcat-mod_jk-on-mac-os-x-leopard/#comment-7306</guid>
		<description>Configuring for Apache, Version 1.3.41
 + using installation path layout: Darwin (config.layout)
configure:Error: invalid option 'CFLAGS=’-arch'


dosen't work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Configuring for Apache, Version 1.3.41<br />
 + using installation path layout: Darwin (config.layout)<br />
configure:Error: invalid option &#8216;CFLAGS=’-arch&#8217;</p>
<p>dosen&#8217;t work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Just for the record: I don&#8217;t actually hate Microsoft by billo</title>
		<link>http://egopoly.com/2005/09/06/just-for-the-record-i-dont-actually-hate-microsoft/#comment-7260</link>
		<dc:creator>billo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egopoly.com/wordpress/2005/09/06/just-for-the-record-i-dont-actually-hate-microsoft/#comment-7260</guid>
		<description>Interesting post.  I'll point out a few things: 

1. Unix is from the 70's primarily, and not the the 60's. In fact, an amusing artifact of the unix time system is that it doesn't really acknowledge time before Jan 1, 1970, at least not in the primary time API.  (I also once worked with an OS that didn't believe in time before 1980, but that system is pretty much defunct now.)

2. People have been working on Unix for 30+ years; the unix of today is probably as different from the original kernels as today's microprocessors are from the mini-computers of that time. (Mini-computers are the size of a large refridgerator up to a small van)

3. My rant (which is 3+ years old now) says nothing about usability.  I'm generally of the opinion that Windows as a UI is perfectly fine in general, far superior in usability to pretty much all others that have ever come along. In fact, I would say that in terms of making computers approachable to "normal" people, only Windows and Mac OS succeeded in a big way. (And by "big way," I don't mean money;  I mean in actually enabling normal people to use a computer productively.)

4. Note that I also said nothing about "installing and customizing systems."  This rant is not "gee, everyone should use Linux" rant.  I love Linux as a server OS, or as a basis for making a stable embedded appliance (e.g. Tivo, phones, whatever).  But it's not, by itself, a solution for desktop computers for normal people.  And it won't be unless a single company with a clear vision invests vast amount of time and money to make a GUI, like Microsoft and Apple have done.  I don't know if such a company exists.

5. The OS is not the UI. Mac OS X is built on a Mach/BSD base.  Various Linux UIs (though I think they are not sufficiently clean for the general population) are all built on Linux. Windows, unfortunately, was built on the parochial kernel that is Windows, and actually derives a lot conceptually from VMS, another proprietary OS that was popular back in the 70s and 80s. Microsoft engineers, while smart, are not as smart as the world's entire computer science population put together.

Cheers,

billo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post.  I&#8217;ll point out a few things: </p>
<p>1. Unix is from the 70&#8217;s primarily, and not the the 60&#8217;s. In fact, an amusing artifact of the unix time system is that it doesn&#8217;t really acknowledge time before Jan 1, 1970, at least not in the primary time API.  (I also once worked with an OS that didn&#8217;t believe in time before 1980, but that system is pretty much defunct now.)</p>
<p>2. People have been working on Unix for 30+ years; the unix of today is probably as different from the original kernels as today&#8217;s microprocessors are from the mini-computers of that time. (Mini-computers are the size of a large refridgerator up to a small van)</p>
<p>3. My rant (which is 3+ years old now) says nothing about usability.  I&#8217;m generally of the opinion that Windows as a UI is perfectly fine in general, far superior in usability to pretty much all others that have ever come along. In fact, I would say that in terms of making computers approachable to &#8220;normal&#8221; people, only Windows and Mac OS succeeded in a big way. (And by &#8220;big way,&#8221; I don&#8217;t mean money;  I mean in actually enabling normal people to use a computer productively.)</p>
<p>4. Note that I also said nothing about &#8220;installing and customizing systems.&#8221;  This rant is not &#8220;gee, everyone should use Linux&#8221; rant.  I love Linux as a server OS, or as a basis for making a stable embedded appliance (e.g. Tivo, phones, whatever).  But it&#8217;s not, by itself, a solution for desktop computers for normal people.  And it won&#8217;t be unless a single company with a clear vision invests vast amount of time and money to make a GUI, like Microsoft and Apple have done.  I don&#8217;t know if such a company exists.</p>
<p>5. The OS is not the UI. Mac OS X is built on a Mach/BSD base.  Various Linux UIs (though I think they are not sufficiently clean for the general population) are all built on Linux. Windows, unfortunately, was built on the parochial kernel that is Windows, and actually derives a lot conceptually from VMS, another proprietary OS that was popular back in the 70s and 80s. Microsoft engineers, while smart, are not as smart as the world&#8217;s entire computer science population put together.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>billo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
